Energize The enigma: When laws and government programmes compete
- Advertisment -

The enigma: When laws and government programmes compete

- Advertisment -

How does one make sense of a law which competes with a programme meant to improve quality of life, when that law authorises subsidies for polluting and health-harming technologies? South Africa can learn from, and should avoid, the mistakes other countries make.

Roger Lilley

The American state of Ohio is a case in point. The Guardian reported recently that Ohio’s governor, Mike DeWine, has signed a law, dubbed HB6, which will authorise the state to subsidise old, dirty, coal-fired power stations, which it calls “legacy assets”. Many believe coal-fired power to no longer be the cheapest way of generating electricity when all associated costs are properly factored into the calculation, which is surely why these power stations need state subsidisation.

Over and above the actual operating cost of a coal-fired power station, including the maintenance and upgrading of equipment, etc., is the cost of ensuring that fine particulates and noxious gases are kept from being emitted into the atmosphere. On top of that are all the costs associated with mining and transporting coal to the power station. Together, these add up to significant costs.

The enigma is that the State of Ohio has a clean air programme in place which seeks, at least on paper, to improve the state’s air quality. Ohio has a history of heavy industry: steel production and automobile manufacturing have supported the state’s growth since the early 20th century, drawing thousands of people to the area and helping the state capital, Columbus, to become, according to Wikipedia, the 14th-most populous city and one of the fastest growing cities in the US. Air quality suffered over the years as these industries, and the power stations which powered them, grew.

Forms of clean energy generation include nuclear power and renewable energy. This new bill, which paradoxically limits the amount of renewable energy generation in the state, offers protection to nuclear and coal-fired power stations, but offers no support to renewable energy.

According to the report, over $150-million per year of taxpayers’ money will be provided to the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant near Toledo and the Perry nuclear plant near Cleveland, which together generate 15% of the state’s electricity, potentially saving them from early closure. Renewable energy provides 2,5% of the state’s electricity. The balance is generated from coal and gas.

The operators claim that in the face of low-priced gas and wind, they cannot operate the plants without financial support from the state. The legislation is expected to cause electric bills to increase considerably for both consumers and industrial customers.

In a country where capitalism rules the realm of business, companies which cannot turn a profit usually fail, or operators move to more profitable technologies. To support these power stations with taxpayers’ money – and still increase their electric bills – can’t be right.

The new law virtually phases out support for wind and solar, while providing $60-million per year for two coal-fired power plants. The two subsidy programmes end in 2026 and 2030 for nuclear plants and coal-burning plants respectively. Ohio is the first US state to bring in ratepayer-funded assistance to coal and nuclear powered electricity generation through direct subsidies and cutting renewable energy subsidies and energy efficiency standards.

At the same time, The Guardian also reports that BlackRock, a global investment manager, lost an estimated $90-billion investing in fossil fuel companies and has been urged to invest in clean energy for the good of the climate and its investors. The company is now facing growing pressure to divest from fossil fuels by investors and environmental groups, which have accused the asset manager of dragging its feet on the climate crisis. The Bank of England has also warned of the “significant risks to the economy and to the financial system” posed by fossil fuel investments, estimating that investments worth $20-trillion could be left “stranded” as governments set more ambitious climate targets.

In the light of these international events, should South Africa really push ahead with its new coal-fired power stations? Eskom announced recently that Kusile – which, after eleven years of construction time, is yet to put power onto the grid – will have three of the six units operational by year-end.

But will it? Previously stated dates have been missed. Should the remaining three not be abandoned? After all, the power utility can’t afford to build them and relies on government bailouts year after year. It therefore seems unwise to bank on coal for the long term given the associated environmental costs while the real cost of renewable energy, even with the additional cost of storage, which receives no subsidy from the South African government, continues to fall.

Send your comments to energize@ee.co.za


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

Local branch opened in Limpopo

Hytec South Africa, a member of the Bosch Rexroth South Africa Group, officially opened its new branch in Lephalale, Limpopo in January 2020. The...

LED lighting controlled by a solar inverter

IMEON Energy announces the release of the LED Smart Lighting application (app) which enables its inverters to interact with smart LED lights from the...

EU plans energy system of the future

Information from the European Commission  -   To become climate-neutral by 2050, Europe needs to transform its energy system, which accounts for 75% of the EU's...

Industry association appoints new board

The South African Photovoltaic Industry Association (SAPVIA) appointed a new board at its recent Annual General Meeting (AGM). SAPVIA is an industry body which...

Popular fuel brand launches contactless fuel-payment app

Engen has announced the arrival of the new Engen 1app, which offers motorists a safe and conveniently contactless way to pay for fuel at its...

Covid-19 calls for “balanced” strategy for technical audits

Engineering projects face a growing range of audits, assessment and monitoring, but will Covid-19 restrictions on movement make it difficult for consultants to carry...

Alternator for cogeneration applications

Nidec Leroy-Somer announces the launch of the LSAH 44.3, an alternator designed for cogeneration applications in district heating. This new alternator incorporates an optimised...

Rapeseed natural ester fluid for EHV transformer

TransnetBW, a German electricity transmission operator, recently ordered a power transformer from Siemens. The specification called for the transformer to be filled with natural...

Natural gas to experience largest demand shock on record

Information from the International Energy Agency  -   Natural gas is expected to experience its largest demand shock on record in 2020 as the Covid-19 pandemic...

Coal for primary energy on the wane

Quoting the Yomiuri daily newspaper, Reuters reports that Japan is planning to suspend or close as many as 100 ageing and inefficient coal-fired power...

Hitachi ABB Power Grids commences operations

Complementary portfolios and technology strengths to ensure continuity, enhance customer value and bring growth opportunities. In accordance with the agreement signed on 17 December...

Energy efficiency: Still the low-hanging fruit

by Fereidoon P. Sioshansi, Ph.D, Menlo Energy -  Efficient use of energy is the key to a low carbon future. “In the battle against climate...

Wind and hydrogen offer potential to drive exports market

Information from the South African Wind Energy Association (SAWEA) The opportunity for South Africa to couple its renewable energy economic stimulus to non-electricity prospects, presents...

Carbon tax regulations regarding allowances and premiums

by Paula-Ann Novotny and Gillian Niven, Webber Wentzel On 19 June 2020, Tito Mboweni, the minister of finance, finalised the next set of regulatory mechanisms...

Battery packs for mobility and back-up power

In addition to supplying lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) battery packs for forklifts in materials-handling applications, Chase Technologies is also ramping up supply to ancillary...
- Advertisement -